Subject: A Novel Idea


Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and
his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New
England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require
them to pay a $500 fee to the state.
Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a
fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear
mandate to do so.
He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by
the government as well as criminals

Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons
who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a
constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required
to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's
license number with the state.
"There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do
so," Maslack says

Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least
restrictive laws of any state ..
it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.
This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate
that is the third lowest in the nation

"America is at that awkward stage.
It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

This makes sense!
There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.

Tags: 2nd, amendment

Share 

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Patriotic Resistance to add comments!

Join this social network

Stan Transue Comment by Stan Transue on November 5, 2009 at 9:38am
If the registration includes their address, and is available for public inspection, all the criminals in Vermont can focus on those households that will present the least resistance to their trade.

If this isn't Moral Darwinism, nothing is. Defend yourself or die.
Jim Richards Comment by Jim Richards on October 29, 2009 at 1:17pm
I love his style.
Μιχάλης89 Comment by Μιχάλης89 on October 22, 2009 at 8:21am
Vote yes!

Click HereWatchdog Index
Resources & Offers Click Here

Books & Resources

Continental Congress 09 Streaming Live:
Click Here
Partner Organization:



Site Help

Darla, Admin/National Coordinator

Admin Assistant, Dee

Admin Assist., Mellie R.

Please Report Abuse and Ask Help Questions in the Help Group.
Click Here

Badge

Loading…

© 2009   Created by Grassfire.org

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!