Watchdog on the San Joaquin Valley Federal Delta Smelt Plan California

Add a Comment

Comment by Frances Gettys on November 8, 2009 at 2:04am

Yes they have been taking over for a long time. That is why 1/3 of the farming has been stopped in the US. They are going after ranchers and putting them out of business. My sister lives in nort east Tennessee very near one of the biocenters in the mountains. Many miles are blocked off and heavily guarded. No one in the area knows what is going on there. People have asked their state officials but did not get a response that made any sense. This is very frightening. And with the government going to a marcist/communist form of government , i feel almost hopeless.

Comment by Linda Alkire on November 8, 2009 at 12:50am

I have been researching Agenda 21 or local agenda 21

http://www.newswithviews.com/Morrison/joyce36.htm
see what you think....

Comment by Frances Gettys on October 29, 2009 at 11:39pm

There are two problems with your solution Dino. Alot of our state leaders are among those who want the new world order. The other is any changes in the Constitution done by them would be to destroy it. They have been ignoring it when passing bills and making laws anyway.

Comment by pauld.sims on October 23, 2009 at 3:06pm

Please look at the discussion about the polar bear and read what i wrote in the comment section it will help you to understand the coralation between the issues . Your Brother Paul

Comment by Debra on October 20, 2009 at 4:38pm

Your Food Supply Began To Be Destroyed in the 1960s—Water "Scarcity" in California Was Deliberate

LaRouche Pac
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/12134

October 20, 2009(LPAC)—The ongoing devastation of the most productive agricultural land, for fruits and vegetables, in the United States, is the result of a 40-year process of devolution, caused by the British Malthusian insistence that it is "nature," not man, that will determine the fate of the universe, and that, in the face of scarce resources, people should die.

Take the situation today in the Central Valley, around Fresno and Bakersfield. Federal waters for agriculture have been totally cut off, for the sake of the Eco-Nazi insistence of saving the fish; unemployment is between 14 and 40%, and dust bowl conditions are growing. Planting such vegetables as lettuce and other crops is being delayed—if they will be planted at all. Large tracts of nuts, avocados, and other trees are being triaged.

No one saw it coming? In fact, the LaRouche Movement's files show that practically the same conditions prevailed in the early 1990s, when there were also five years of drought, and environmentalist crazies insisted upon water cuts in order to provide water for the salmon. In addition, the state authorities cut all water to agriculture, preferring to send the limited supply to the cities. In December 1991, there were actually dust storms (Great Depression style) on the main highway in the Central Valley.

But the die was actually cast even earlier than that. During the 1950s, water supply expansion plans had been devised by California hydrologists to make full use of state resources in the "California Water Plan," and for continental-scale water supply expansion with what became the North American Water and Power Alliance. California-based Parsons Engineering prepared a full work-up of NAWAPA. But by the 1960s, the environmentalist, anti-infrastructure cabal had moved in.

Favorable hearings were held in Congress on NAWAPA in 1966, but soon afterward, Congress passed legislation restricting "inter-basin water transfer," under the influence of British agent Sen. Scoop Jackson (D-WA), and the prospects were never revived. On the state level, the last major aspect of the California Water Plan, which was adopted in 1957, was completed in 1976, the California Aqueduct. But the plans to make full use of the state's northern run-off were never completed.

The flurry of activity currently visible on the California crisis will produce nothing, if this long-term causality is not faced, and remedied by a future-oriented perspective. With the implementation of bankruptcy reorganization and re-establishment of a constitutional credit system, one of the first major projects should be NAWAPA.

For more on the NAWAPA, LaRouchePAC produced an excellent feature documentary, NAWAPA-PLHINO: The Future of the Americas.

Comment by Joe Lamb on October 13, 2009 at 10:11pm

The time will come.

Comment by Al on October 10, 2009 at 11:15pm

The California Water v. Delta Smelt War (Updated)

February 21, 2009 by Procrustes

One third of the world’s population are already facing problems due to both water shortage and poor drinking water quality. Effects include massive outbreaks of disease, malnourishment and crop failure. Furthermore, excessive use of water has seen the degradation of the environment costing the world billions of dollars.–SaveWater.com.

san-joaquin-sacramento-delta-1This takes us to the reason for this post, an article published December 17, 2008, in The Bakersfield Californian. Staff writer Courtenay Edelhart reported on a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decision regarding water districts that “rely on the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta (left) for much of their water supply” and that “could potentially hike water rates for consumers and hurt farmers already smarting from a drought.”

In 2007, a federal judge ruled state and federal pumps sending some 6 million acre-feet of delta water south to Kern County and other users each year could wipe out the endangered smelt, a tiny silver fish. The court ruled pumping had to be curtailed by about a third until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could weigh in on the problem.

delta-smeltOn Monday, the federal agency submitted a 400-page “biological opinion” to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on the effects of pumping by the Federal Central Valley Project and the California State Water Project. The agency concluded pumping was “likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the delta smelt (right) and adversely modify its critical habitat,” and offered a plan to mitigate damage.

The plan would keep current restrictions in place, and even more limits could kick in under certain conditions. Further cuts would be triggered in a variety of scenarios, including limited rainfall during key periods in the fish’s spawning cycle.

Robber’s Roost, Kern Co., Calif.
robbers-roost-kern-co-calif-2005Jim Beck, general manager of the Kern County Water Agency, which contracts for water on behalf of agricultural, municipal and industrial water districts in Kern, said “Implementing the plan would reduce water supplies from San Diego to San Jose by 20 to 30 percent on average, but up to 50 percent in some years.”

As always, this is not the end of the story. Other water districts, which “have long argued that pumping isn’t the real culprit in the smelt’s demise,” are “gearing up for a fight.”

Invasive species, pollution and greater municipal and industrial uses of delta water are important factors that have not been given enough attention, said Robert Kunde, assistant engineer manager for the Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District.

“There are a number of good reasons to believe that even if State Water Project pumps were cut entirely, the delta smelt may very well go extinct,” Kunde said.

Al Donner, assistant field supervisor for the Sacramento field office of the Fish and Wildlife Service, said all that has been looked at, but pumping cannot be discounted.

“The indices that track the smelt show the last couple of years, they’ve been at their lowest numbers ever,” he said. “The species clearly is in trouble.”

bakersfield-farm-lettuce-irrigationBack in June 2008, the Bakersfield paper reported on the second year of drought problems for farmers who once grew such products as cotton, pistachios, almonds and alfalfa.

Faced with too little rain and restricted pumping to protect an endangered fish, farmers and ranchers in and around Kern County are facing tough choices. In a typical year, 850,000 acres are irrigated, according to the Kern County Water Agency.

This year, about 45,000 of them will be idle at a cost of $46 million. In addition, 100,000 acres will be “underirrigated,” causing a $59 million loss.

Also in June 2008, the Bakersfield paper reported that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation was “further shrinking the amount of water allocated to farmers subject to the Central Valley Project contract, which regulates water use on many farms in the Kern County area.”

“It’s not a pretty year,” said Fred Starrh of Starrh and Starrh Farms, … “There’s just not a lot of water around. It’s almost like gasoline for us. The price of water has almost tripled.”

A mile high plume of dust over Bakersfield, Calif., December 1977
bakersfield-dec-1977-desertdustIn October 2008, the Bakersfield paper reported on “plans to cut water allocations to cities and farms to the second lowest level since it began making deliveries in 1962, which local growers said could push farmland out of production and boost already soaring grocery prices higher.”

The California Department of Water Resources says that after two consecutive dry years and court-ordered restrictions on pumping from the environmentally sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the State Water Project will deliver just 15 percent of the water that water agencies across the state have requested for next year.

That’s down from 35 percent delivered this year, and so low that officials warned some cities may be forced to ration and make voluntary conservation efforts mandatory. [...]

Without court-ordered restrictions to protect the threatened Delta smelt from pumping, the state’s water allocation would have been 20 percent, 5 percent more than what’s been predicted.

Additionally …

Kern County Water Agency general manager Jim Beck said between the smelt and explosive Central Valley population growth, there is far more demand for water today than during the last major drought of 1988 to 1992.

bakersfield-california-drought-jun-08-for-saleThat means farmers are going to have to add to the 20,000 acres left fallow this year for lack of water. Beck estimates 90,000 acres in Kern County will be affected next year, including 50,000 not planted at all, and 40,000 acres of permanent crops watered enough to stay alive but not enough to bear fruit. [...]

Also, the drought has mostly affected annual crops, which are much easier to take out of production for a season or two. But if there’s a third dry year, permanent crops such as orchards and vines are going to either be removed completely or kept barely alive…

Now, you ask, what makes this a “water war”?

Would it interest you to know that as recently as October 2005 “agriculture” had finally “won” a 50-year water war in this same part of California — with the Bush administration “driving the trend”?

Central Valley irrigation districts are signing federal contracts that assure their farms ample water for the next 25 to 50 years. [...]

In the western San Joaquin Valley, a desert is blooming with cotton and produce, all sustained with water from California’s northern rivers.

But in the places where this water once flowed — the delta of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, the Trinity River in the far north state — fisheries have declined drastically. That’s a direct result, biologists say, of water diversions to the south.

First among the winners of the water wars is the Westlands Water District (right, 2001) southeast of Fresno — the nation’s largest irrigation district.

Pancake flat, this 600,000 acres of arid alkali dirt is one of California’s most desolate regions.

Yet Westlands is growing riotously: not in homes or shopping malls, but in melons, tomatoes, almonds, cotton and myriad other crops. Its fields produced about $1 billion in food and fiber last year.

And there’s more:

westlands-water-district

Westlands gets its water from the federal Central Valley Project, which supplies water to a third of California’s cropland and about 50 cities, including Sacramento, San Jose and several in the East Bay and on the Peninsula.

The district’s annual allotment of about 1.15 million acre feet — enough to supply about 2.3 million families — dwarfs those of all other project participants. The next biggest, the Contra Costa Water District’s, is only 185,000 acre feet.

An acre foot is the amount of water that covers an acre a foot deep.

Now, Westlands and other districts are successfully renewing their long-term contracts at current levels and at prices far below those paid by the state’s growing cities, despite protests that pumping large volumes of water south is killing Northern California’s fisheries.

Westlands is singled out for particular criticism because of its size and the amount of water it receives, but also because the irrigation of its fields produces toxic drain water, threatening state waterways. Some critics say much of its acreage should be taken out of production.

westlands-water-district-irrigationSo far, about 200 contracts have been approved, and 80 more are pending, including Westlands’. About 6 million acre feet of annual water deliveries is at stake.

Farmers who get federal water are generally charged a fraction of the free-market rate.

Then along comes a two-year drought and the tiny silvery endangered delta smelt that sends up a red flag about the whole thing.

delta-smelt-habitatOn July 10, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service changed the status of the “critically imperiled delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) from threatened to endangered” under the federal Endangered Species Act. However, the Bay Institute, Center for Biological Diversity, and Natural Resources Defense Council had “petitioned the Service in 2006 requesting a change in the federal listing. The finding is 25 months late, and a final listing determination is already 13 months overdue.”

“We are seeing a cascading series of crashing Delta fish populations – delta smelt, longfin smelt, chinook salmon, steelhead trout, green sturgeon, Sacramento splittail, striped bass – the warning bells are ringing loud and clear,” said Jeff Miller with the Center for Biological Diversity. “The ecological collapse of the Delta threatens more than just our native fish since millions of people depend on the Delta for drinking water, agriculture, and fishing.”

Delta smelt are an indicator of the health of the San Francisco Bay-Delta ecosystem, and the smelt population has plummeted since 1993 when it was listed as threatened. Smelt abundance this summer is the fourth lowest on record since surveys began in 1959. Federal and state agencies have allowed record levels of water diversions from the Delta in recent years, leaving insufficient fresh water to sustain native fish and the Delta ecosystem.

Not only that, the situation was further threatened by the Governator:

“The governor’s proposal to build more dams, as well as regulatory efforts to continue to allow record freshwater diversions from the Delta when most of our native fish species are struggling to survive, makes no sense,” said Miller. “The state and federal water projects need to change their operations to eliminate reverse flows in Delta channels and prevent further losses of fish at the pumps.”

So, this is the end of the story, right? Nope. Time for a lawsuit.

On December 9, 2008, State Water Contractors, a statewide organization of 27 public water agencies, filed a lawsuit

…against the California Fish & Game Commission and the California Department of Fish & Game challenging the Commission’s recent decision to potentially impose substantial cuts in State Water Project (SWP) water deliveries to much of the San Francisco Bay Area, the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California in an effort to protect the longfin smelt. The lawsuit asserts that the Commission’s November 14, 2008 decision opens the door for dramatic new restrictions on SWP and
Central Valley Project (CVP) water pumping operations out of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) without any significant corresponding benefit to the fish species and, in so doing, violates key elements of the California Endangered Species Act. Last month, the Commission approved these regulations as a precautionary measure in its desire to protect the longfin smelt, a fish species found in estuaries from Monterey Bay to Alaska.

Bottom line? In addition to current drought conditions, decrepit infrastructure, invasive species, and the water quality itself at risk, that is? Reduced water deliveries and negative “economic impact” to the SWP and U.S.-operated CVP. M-O-N-E-Y.

san-joaquin-sacramento-delta-2This is only one little piece of a country- and worldwide iceberg but a good illustration of what lies ahead.

There is a new administration in Washington, with many departments and policies yet to be determined. The reign of the Governator is in peril. So much can change in a very short time — much like the weather.

As these Bakersfield newspaper articles indicate, there has been a 50-year plus battle in this one part of our country, one which is a major source of our food supply.

Comment by Mary Adrian on October 4, 2009 at 4:39pm

I don't know if this has been addressed yet. I just found out and joined this group today. I was trying to do some research on line about it, then report it to Glenn Beck's watchdog group if I could find some info that I could verify.
I got an email from a friend of a friend and thought it was another explanation for what is really going on. This person said he was in Europe years ago on a fact finding team formed by Pete Wilson from CA with 2 other members of the Foreign Ag Service. They met several members of the U.S. State Department there, who were in on a plan to cease all farming in the U.S. They thought they could get food cheaper from Central and South America and that would free up our farm land for the coming population expansion. That would make the lives of the poor in Central and South America better and we would be in a position to grow our population. The plan was to have open borders with Canada, Mexico and Central and South America.
I was able to find an article on line about the open border conspiracy. Written by Robert Locke of the Ford Foundation on Front Page Magazine.
That's about as far as I've gotten with my own research. It does sound like a plausible plan to me and a very good reason to dry up this farmland.
So basically, I'm wondering if anyone else has ran across this explanation and what you all might think about it?
Thanks.
Mary

Comment by Frances Gettys on October 4, 2009 at 12:49pm

How do we get this out so people can see it?





http://www.garagetv.be/video-galerij/blancostemrecht/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle_Documentary_Film.aspx

Comment by Melanie W on October 3, 2009 at 12:56am

Please commend Rep. Ken Calvert (CA-44 (R)) for speaking out on the floor of the house during discussion of H.Res. 788 to express his condemnation of passing anything related with water appropriations without a measure to ammend the federal opposition to the pumps in this region of CA

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last