Obama nominates Espinel for IP czar
Obama nominates Espinel for IP czar
By Tom Braithwaite in Washington
Published: September 26 2009 01:10 | Last updated: September 26 2009 01:10
The Obama administration on Friday nominated Victoria Espinel as co-ordinator for intellectual property enforcement, a new position demanded by the entertainment industry to help it battle copyright theft.
Ms Espinel’s role, shortened to IP ‘czar’ long before the current administration’s fondness for czars became a political issue, was created last year as part of a bill that also imposes severe penalties in counterfeiting cases.
“Intellectual property protection, promotion, and enforcement will now be rightly elevated to the highest level of the executive branch, an important sign about the administration’s commitment to protecting jobs throughout America’s IP-intensive industries,” said Mark Esper, executive vice-president at the US Chamber of Commerce.
The Chamber estimates almost 18m workers in the US are employed in sectors for which intellectual property is a substantial part of business.
NBC Universal, the media group, celebrated the appointment and said Ms Espinel “should be well-positioned to ensure that American innovation and creativity generate American jobs”.
“Paul Almeida, president of Department for Professional Employees at the AFL-CIO trades union group, said Ms Espinel - whose appointment needs to be confirmed by the Senate - should focus on protecting US workers from overseas infringement of intellectual property.
“There are a lot of issues as far as our position versus other countries - there continues to be an imbalance,” he said. “It goes from the A-list performers down to stagehands to everyone who’s involved in production.”
The US has brought cases at the World Trade Organisation against China, claiming that the country has not done enough to protect US companies’ copyright on products such as DVDs.
In another case, involving the two countries and the US entertainment industry, China this week filed a last-minute appeal against a World Trade Organisation ruling that it unfairly restricts the sale of US films, music and books, reviving an argument that its restrictions were needed to protect public morals and Chinese culture.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
By Tom Braithwaite in Washington
Published: September 26 2009 01:10 | Last updated: September 26 2009 01:10
The Obama administration on Friday nominated Victoria Espinel as co-ordinator for intellectual property enforcement, a new position demanded by the entertainment industry to help it battle copyright theft.
Ms Espinel’s role, shortened to IP ‘czar’ long before the current administration’s fondness for czars became a political issue, was created last year as part of a bill that also imposes severe penalties in counterfeiting cases.
“Intellectual property protection, promotion, and enforcement will now be rightly elevated to the highest level of the executive branch, an important sign about the administration’s commitment to protecting jobs throughout America’s IP-intensive industries,” said Mark Esper, executive vice-president at the US Chamber of Commerce.
The Chamber estimates almost 18m workers in the US are employed in sectors for which intellectual property is a substantial part of business.
NBC Universal, the media group, celebrated the appointment and said Ms Espinel “should be well-positioned to ensure that American innovation and creativity generate American jobs”.
“Paul Almeida, president of Department for Professional Employees at the AFL-CIO trades union group, said Ms Espinel - whose appointment needs to be confirmed by the Senate - should focus on protecting US workers from overseas infringement of intellectual property.
“There are a lot of issues as far as our position versus other countries - there continues to be an imbalance,” he said. “It goes from the A-list performers down to stagehands to everyone who’s involved in production.”
The US has brought cases at the World Trade Organisation against China, claiming that the country has not done enough to protect US companies’ copyright on products such as DVDs.
In another case, involving the two countries and the US entertainment industry, China this week filed a last-minute appeal against a World Trade Organisation ruling that it unfairly restricts the sale of US films, music and books, reviving an argument that its restrictions were needed to protect public morals and Chinese culture.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Sansterre on -
The parent company of NBC Universal is GE, who's CEO is Jeff Immelt (name sound familiar). Vivendi (a French company) owns 20% of NBC Universal as well (recently heard that Vivendi wanted to sell their 20%, don't know if they did so already). If you look up Vivendi, you'll find that in addition to media they also have a sizable ownership of the worlds (drinkable) water supply.
-
Permalink Reply by Darrell from Alliance on -
Just a minute, I didn't think that any of the "czars" had to have Senate approval. I heard on talk radio that they did not and didn't have to answer to anyone but Obama and could not be indicted for any mistakes.
-
Permalink Reply by teresa on -
some have which ones i don't know
Alexander issued a statement saying that "Eighteen of the administration’s 32 czars hold new positions that did not exist in previous administrations and were not authorized by law. These czars are unconfirmed by the Senate, unavailable for questioning, and unaccountable to the American people through their elected representatives."
Senate Schedules Hearing on History and Legality of Presidential “C...
September 29, 2009 5:03 PM
Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., announced today that his Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution will hold a hearing “Examining the History and Legality of Executive Branch 'Czars'” on Tuesday October 6.
Earlier this month the liberal lawmaker asked the White House to identify the czars' "roles and responsibilities, and provide the judgment(s) of your legal advisors as to whether and how these positions are consistent with the Appointments Clause" in Article II, section 2 of the Constitution, which states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States."
Previous presidents have made ample use of the privilege to appoint executive branch experts who are not confirmed by the Senate and oversee one particular area, but experts say President Obama has done so to an unprecedented degree.
In April, David Rothkopf wrote at the Foreign Policy blog with the appointment of a Border Czar, President Obama had more czars than the Romanovs.
-jpt
Examining the History and Legality of Executive Branch 'Czars'”
Senate Judiciary Committee
Subcommittee on the Constitution
View a webcast of this hearing
DATE: October 6, 2009
TIME: 02:00 PM
ROOM: Dirksen-226
OFFICIAL HEARING NOTICE / WITNESS LIST:
September 29, 2009
NOTICE OF SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution has scheduled a hearing on "Examining the History and Legality of Executive Branch 'Czars'" for Tuesday, October 6, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Office Building.
Chairman Feingold will preside
By order of the Chairman
-
Permalink Reply by teresa on
-
Alexander issued a statement saying that "Eighteen of the administration’s 32 czars hold new positions that did not exist in previous administrations and were not authorized by law. These czars are unconfirmed by the Senate, unavailable for questioning, and unaccountable to the American people through their elected representatives."
New Podcast 3/17/10
Haiti Disaster Relief
Click HereFollow us on Twitter!
Follow Us on Facebook
Forum
It is time to start the 2nd American Revolution 14 Replies
Started by John P. in General, Uncategorized Town Hall. Last reply by Patti 1 minute ago.
Stupak Sells Out For Executive Order That Could Be Rescinded Anytime 28 Replies
Started by G. Zorn in General, Uncategorized Town Hall. Last reply by Linda Juanita Smith 4 minutes ago.
MY HEART IS DOWNTRODDEN WITH SUCH A BURDEN FOR THIS ONCE GREAT NATION AND HOW MUCH MORE ARE WE WILLING TO TAKE??? 4 Replies
Started by Trisha in Constitutional Issues. Last reply by Trisha 5 minutes ago.
Well...They got their 216 votes....How many of us are actually going to go along with this???? 11 Replies
Started by Sherrie Nickerson in Admin Alerts. Last reply by CJ 5 minutes ago.
You want the names? Here they are!!! 1 Reply
Started by Cynthia Gialluca in General, Uncategorized Town Hall. Last reply by Debbie 10 minutes ago.
Blog Posts
Origins of the Word 'Capitalism'
Posted by New Orleans Sam on March 22, 2010 at 12:05am
A Sad Day, Indeed
Posted by Sanford Butler on March 21, 2010 at 11:51pm
Do not get too mad, but do get VERY even
Posted by Rex Jackson on March 21, 2010 at 11:41pm
OBAMACARE
Posted by Helen M.Demmie McKane on March 21, 2010 at 11:35pm
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants". Thomas Jefferson
Posted by Carly on March 21, 2010 at 11:30pm — 2 Comments
Latest Activity
Yes Barb - what a beautiful word from the Lord because HE IS GOOD! And I'm close to tears for this country after this health care bill passed - we can only pray. HE has the power to reverse anything. if only the country would REPENT. But you know th…
There are two key tacks to take here. First is to back the Governor to file suit. Thre are gounds under Art 1 Sec 9 Clause 3 (bills of attainder), Art 1 Sec 8 and 10th amendment. We have to remember we have a 5-4 conservative court which has been do…
Pelosi just claimed that todays travesty honors our founding fathers
The federal government takeover of the health care industry and your loss of medical freedom only lacks a Presidential signature to become a federal law. We the people know that this cannot stand if America is to remain a free country. Keep your hea…
We cannot forget that one John P. imagine if we stop him there...the air would be clean again...
We have to organize something big! Its time to stand up for our freedom
That's what I wanna know???? I forgot we need to push the Eligibility issue.
If this obamacare passes. Then he signs an unconstitutional bill into "law". No one has to comply. Any bill that's unconstitutional is null and void from inception.
Rick
I am sick ya all a bill that didn't even pass the senate, a bill that passed the house by only 3, a bill that was bought and paid for by tax payers and generations of our chldren, a bill that has not one republican vote in the house or senate, and a…
Then find and support good, conservative candidates in your areas/districts...
Angel By My Side (Song for Our Military Heroes)
Chris
I agree with you this Amnesty is going to be a fight. Legal Americans need to stop the illegals from taking over their lives, their jobs their Country. They want it all...and so does Obama...
THANK YOU FOR YOUR INFORMATION JAMES. PLEASE LET US KNOW WHEN YOU KNOW SOMETHING FOR SURE.
Yes I have been playing that game already were suppose to have floor meetings at school about the Census my game plan is to skip out on them....
March 3, 2010 - Rasmussen Poll says - 67% Say Illegal Immigrants Are Major Strain on U.S. Budget
When they start pushing the Amnesty thing - I can't wait to see his poll numbers!
With Nov only 7 months away - I don't think illegals can save them -…
Amnesty will be our next fight......how will we fight that?
Badge
© 2010 Created by Grassfire Nation
