Ted Nugent for President

Comment

Comment by msamericanpatriot on February 21, 2010 at 8:03am

Ron does that include hunting down certain sexual degenerates that the Bible loaths when we hunt down the liberals. If so count me in the hunt.

Comment by Ron Brahin on February 21, 2010 at 2:37am

If Ted was President, here are some positives.

We could buy one gun an hour.
Get rid of liberals
Declare on day a Month as National Hunting Day
Get rid of liberals
Declare five days a month for hunting Progressive liberals
Keep us up to-date on his favorite firearm
Git rid of liberals
Restore the Constitution
Get rid of liberals
Bring back family values
Create job, jobs, jobs
invite us to dinner and a hunt now and then.

All sounds good to me.

Comment by Karl Gustave on February 15, 2010 at 9:03am

Please visit the new "A MORE PERFECT UNION" website:

http://amoreperfectunion.ning.com/

Thanks!

Karl

Comment by John Stenman on November 17, 2009 at 2:27pm

OBAMA TO REVERSE GUN POLICY
Mon Nov 2, 2009 12:54am

Obama Takes First Step in Banning All Firearms

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States.

The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.

Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.

The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws.

Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?

What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public.

We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership.

And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

Read the Article

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

Source: The Full Article

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.

Silence will lead us to Socialism.

Comment by John Stenman on September 23, 2009 at 5:15pm

If you think that a "czar" is unconstitutional. ...you might be a racist!

If you're opposed to a government run health care system....you
might be a racist!

If you think that it is unAmerican to bow before the Saudi King....
you might be a racist!

If you think that the stimulus plan has been an utter failure...you
might be a racist!

If you think the Obama administration is driving the deficit up at alarming rates....you might be a racist!

If you think that this nation was based on European values....you might be a racist!

If you think that Marxian-socialism is not the solution to America's troubles.... you might be a racist!

If you value the first amendment, but think the mainstream media is run by the liberal elitists.... you might be a racist!

If you're sick of the cry of "racism" from minority racists and hypocritical liberals...you might be a racist!

And if you're a racist according to the current liberal agenda...you
might just be a real American.

Comment by John Stenman on August 9, 2009 at 12:39am

I may be an instigator, but I just sent a message to the SNITCH site, flag@whitehouse.gov. It reads: "Last time I checked, the Constitution was still the SUPREME law of the land and the First Amendment was still part of the Constitution. So you all can KISS MY RIGHT WING EXTREMIST POTENTIAL TERRORIST THREAT ASS!" Maybe that will get them thinking.

Comment by Susanne on August 3, 2009 at 4:49pm

Ted Nugent: Apologies? Due only to Churchill

Waco Tribune-Herald


TED NUGENT Texas Wildman
Sunday, July 26, 2009

Winston Churchill once said, “If you have an important point to make, don’t try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver.”

Winston was a whack’em and stack’em kind of guy — the kind I admire. Everything good in life is a direct result of pile drivers pile-driving on. I pile-drive at all costs. I am a pile driver.

Apparently that’s not Barack Obama’s style. Nor was Churchill his kind of leader. Recently, it was reported that when Great Britain offered to extend the stay of a bust of Churchill that had been in a place of honor at George W. Bush’s White House, Obama said the Brits could have it back.

Quite rude of a guy who would not be worthy to stand in Churchill’s shadow.

Then, Barry O hopped on Air Force One and embarked on an apologizing-for-America world tour, where he sidled up to our enemies and turned his back on our allies.

Write this down: By the time we toss him out of the office he was hopelessly ill-prepared to fill, Obama will have damaged our international image far worse than what Jimmy Carter ever did.

Never trust a president who, as Charles Krauthammer recently wrote, finds himself on the side of Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega and the Castro twins.

My dear old Army drill sergeant dad told me repeatedly, “Tell me who you go with, and I’ll tell you what you are.”

Now I get it.

Israel can surely no longer expect America’s support, even if the religious voodoo clowns in Iran launch an offensive against them.

Israel knows that war with Iran is not a question of if, but when.

John Bolton, America’s former United Nations representative recently wrote that he believes there is an 80 percent to 90 percent chance that Israel will attempt to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities before the end of the year.

Let’s hope so. A world without Iran having access to nuclear weapons is a safer world.

Liberal buffoons believe in John Lennon’s lyrics: “All we are saying, is give peace a chance.” I believe what Karl vonClausewitz wrote: “To secure peace is to prepare for war.”

Peace and love will get you killed. True peace is achieved through the application and unrelenting use of superior firepower.

History tells us the Roman Empire did not attempt to negotiate peace with its enemies. Instead, it went about the task of killing the enemy. Romans rocked.

America’s strongest arrow in our international quiver is to always, always stand for freedom and liberty.

We must never waiver in our support for those who also respect these virtuous qualities. Turning our backs on our friends and embracing our enemies is dumber than giving Joe Biden an open microphone or Ted Kennedy the car keys.

One has to wonder if Barry O has read the book that human rights violator, anti-freedom and socialist thug Hugo Chavez gave him.

Let us not forget that Barry O smiled, shook Chavez’s hand and accepted the book but mandated the bust of Churchill be returned to the United Kingdom. My dad was right.

Ted Nugent is a Waco-based musician and television show host. Contact him directly at tednugent.com.


http://www.wacotrib.com/opin/content/news/opinion/stories/2009/07/26/07262009wacnugent.html

Comment by kenneth diamond on July 22, 2009 at 10:08pm

Like most folks in this country, I have a job. I work,
they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes
my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck in my
case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I
have no problem). What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my Question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine
test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn
it for them?
Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get
back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem
with helping someone sitting on their ass - doing drugs,
while I work. . . . Can you imagine how much money each state
would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public
assistance check?
I guess we could title that program, 'Urine or You're Out'.
Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though. Some thing has to
change in this country -- and soon!!!!!!!

Comment by Susanne on July 22, 2009 at 2:30am

Comment by Asst Natl Dir Mellie on July 4, 2009 at 9:49am

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 8
• Next ›
• Page