Add a Comment

Comment by Mel Frost 1 day ago

HERE ARE SOME FURTHER FACTS ABOUT THIS SONIC DEVICE.
The actual "projector" is about 20" across and about 6" deep...it is Hex shaped metal encased... I would call it a "very, very" efficient transducer and from what I can read, it is above human hearing frec's.
This is a "priority" target in any encounter!!!

San Diego Sheriff Gore deploys military sonic LRAD area denial weapons at political meetings
September 12, 11:53 AMSan Diego Law Enforcement ExaminerAdam ThomasPrevious Next 10 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the San Diego Law Enforcement Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use. Email Address


Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use



LRAD sonic weapon mounted on US Military armored infantry Stryker vehicle

East County Magazine broke a story yesterday that is now starting to get Nationwide attention, and might have a significant effect on the upcoming San Diego County Sheriff's race in 2010, if not sooner.

It appears that Interim Sheriff Bill Gore has decided to deploy high-tech sonic Weapons, designed for military use, at local political gatherings. These are the same LRAD sonic weapons which are currently being deployed against pirates off of the coast of Somalia and against Taliban attackers in Afghanistan by the US Army.

For critics of Bill Gore, this news comes as no surprise. Gore has a history of heavy handed actions toward American citizens. In 1992 he was the FBI's agent in charge of the highly criticized Ruby Ridge incident; issuing "shoot on sight" orders to his snipers and other FBI SWAT Team operators. This resulted in the homicide of the families mother, who was holding her baby in her arms at the time the FBI snipers bullet stuck and killed her. The family's son and family dog were also killed. Gore later plead the fifth at the Senate subcommittee hearing, which heavily criticized the FBI for this incident. The FBI later fired and disciplined numerous members of Gore's FBI assault team, but as the senior agent in charge of the assault, Gore came out apparently unscathed.

When regional reporters asked the Sheriff's staff at the recent events regarding the weapon aspect of the devices, they downplayed the sonic weapon aspect of the LRAD, insisting that it was there to be used for it's hailing capability, if necessary. However, when Bill Gore was interviewed by East County Magazine's Editor Miriam Raftery, he stated that the hailing capability was not the primary purpose of the weapon's deployment...Doh! Considering the Magazine's photo of the LRAD weapon deployment, which appears to have a Sheriff's Search and Rescue member driving the weapon around on the back of a quad ATV, that would have been the perfect opportunity for Gore to assert the LRAD was being used as a Search and Rescue / Public address system; a use the local San Diego manufacturer ATC lists on their website for suggested deployments. Nowhere on ATC's website does it list "Tactical deployment against US Citizen's at political rallies".

Critics of this pre-staging deployment of sonic weapons at political events insist that they could have a chilling effect on free speech rights via intimidation. They could be construed as a modern equivalent to water cannon trucks and rows of riot troops. No doubt historical references to civil rights and labor protests will ensue. This isn't the first time the LRAD weapons have shown up at political events. The NYPD, also not known for the respect of citizen rights, deployed LRAD's an RNC event in New York.

Since the County Board of Supervisors directly appointed Bill Gore as Interim Sheriff last year, they are effectively directly responsible for his controversial actions... wait for that shoe to drop in the coming days.

I wonder if the Sheriff's department has any orders in for the new Thermal Heat Ray guns the US Army is now testing.... Those looked really cool on that high-tech weapons TV show!

Comment by Jan Rogers 1 day ago

Urgent message for anyone in Oath Keepers, and urgent for all the rest of us.
obama is gearing up to stop the TEA parties, or any other gathering.
http://cl.publicaster.com/ViewInBrowser.aspx?pubids=7889%7c48%7c3683&digest=lM6dIRk8N%2fezo8jKulmMaQ

Comment by Lisa Allen - MT 11 Dist. Coord. on November 18, 2009 at 3:00am

END the FED Rallies in Bozeman and Helena on Sunday, November 22nd!!

http://montanaconservative.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/end-the-fed-rallies-in-bozeman-and-helena-november-22nd/

Comment by Chrissy, St. Director,Central FL on November 17, 2009 at 11:36pm

Comment by Jim Walters/Montana State Dirct. on November 17, 2009 at 9:56pm

How clever Obama and his goon squad think they are.

1. Questions: How do you spell “Health Care Rationing”?
Answer: Here’s how! new guidelines from a government task force that recommends against routine mammograms for women under 50, questioning whether they are tantamount to health care "rationing" in the fight against the No. 2 cancer killer in U.S. women.
2. Question: How does Obama prove his “Stimulus Package” is working?
Answer: Create phantom Congressional Districts. In Arizona's 15th congressional district, 30 jobs have been saved or created with just $761,420 in federal stimulus spending. There's one problem, though: There is no 15th congressional district in Arizona; the state has only eight districts.
3. Question: How does Obama cover up his ties to “Islamic Terrorist” and “Islamic Terrorist Attack on American soil?”
Answer: You order the “Senate Armed Services Committee to postponed its Monday briefing” on the deadly Fort Hood massacre until “Obama has time to cover up his connection to the Islamic Terrorist!”

Obama and his Organized Crime Organization, totally Corrupt Administration, and the Socialist Democrats now in the US house and Us Senate have no right to impede or stop any investigation regarding Islamic Terrorist activities in the United States.

Comment by Jim Walters/Montana State Dirct. on November 17, 2009 at 1:59pm

Lisa , Muslim is far from many religions , there bible ( Koran ) tells them how they should live , not just pray , and it covers all aspects of life , It also tells them what they should do with people who do not follow there beliefs !!! It is a complete how you should live your life , how government should be run and so on .

Comment by Lisa Jensen on November 17, 2009 at 12:55pm

This is scary, is it true????

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamiszation begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, for the most part they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for
Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel." -- Leon Uris, The Haj

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

Comment by Jan Rogers on November 17, 2009 at 12:11pm

The charge of "Treason" filed against President Obama in US District Court, Washington (09-346-RCL)


PRESS RELEASE: November 17th, 2009 by American Grand Jury


Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick III levels charge in an effort to avert what he described as a pending civil war.

American Grand Jury has incorporated the Fitzpatrick criminal complaint within its Presentments. The Presentments were served on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on July 2nd, 2009. The Presentments are still pending before Chief Judge Royce Lamberth. Two Orders, a Motion to Reconsider, and a Response have been issued. The American Grand Jury Response to the Court's 2nd Order was filed in late October. The Response is currently pending before the Court.

If acted upon, the Grand Jury Presentments would require that Obama be criminally indicted for fraud as to "Eligibility" and "Treason" per the Fitzpatrick complaint.

American Grand Jury is actively pursuing the serving of Presentments in a number of United States District Courts in different States.

Please visit http://ProsecuteObama.org for further details.

Copyright 2009 by American Grand Jury - all rights reserved.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PRESS RELEASE ABOVE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


During the American Revolution 70% of the people were loyal to the King or apathetic. The other 30% founded a Nation.


Thanks for visiting our website: http://americangrandjury.org

Privacy issues: Your email address is safe with us. You will notice we email directly to your name and NOT some CC bulk mailing format. We will never share your email address with any outside source. If you would like to be removed from our mailing list simply reply to this message and let us know your concerns. We understand and appreciate your right to privacy. Thanks for being with us today! Blessings, Bob Campbell, AGJ

Many folks want to serve God, but only as advisers.

Comment by Jim Walters/Montana State Dirct. on November 16, 2009 at 9:06pm

well thats quite a post Jan , I just happen to have a spare gas can and wood for a nice fire , I can go to Blockposter and blow up a few photo's , all we need are the wienies ! Ohhh and maybe some beer , then they can call us drunkin hoodlum extremists !!!

Comment by Jim Johnson aka JJ on November 16, 2009 at 8:36pm

Finally the NRA has taken a stance on our side! Finally they have officially taken a stance on the obama machine. Below is from an update email the NRA sent out today.

One of the radical ideological appointees embedded in the Obama political machine is a man with a dream for the First Amendment. His name is Mark Lloyd, and as Obama’s “Diversity Czar” at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), he plans to wield immense power over the way Americans can communicate.

In his vision, a day would come when talk radio would be replaced with government-approved “progressive” local radio and by a smothering National People’s Radio.

In his vision . . . Rush Limbaugh would be gone. Glenn Beck, gone. Lou Dobbs, off the air. Sean Hannity, silenced. Laura Ingraham, history. The networks and satellite broadcasters that now carry those broadcasts would be broken up, and their affiliate stations “delicensed,” replaced by “local” licensees--all in the name of diversity.

Free choice would be dead, as would the free flow of ideas. At the same time, government radio would be bloated with funds taken as punitive license fees from remaining commercial broadcasters. In the Orwellian name of “diversity,” censorship will reign.

It is Katrina for the First Amendment.

Well before President Obama began packing the federal bureaucracies with his personal “czars,” I warned of the influence of the George Soros-bankrolled Center for American Progress (CAP).

The man who heads that far-left think tank, John Podesta, ran Obama’s post-election transition team and was key to filling positions in the Obama Chicago-style federal machine. As White House chief of staff, he was one of Bill Clinton’s hatchet men on federal gun control.

Among the most critical targets for Podesta’s transition was the Federal Communications Commission. His most important appointee to the FCC was Mark Lloyd, who as a CAP fellow, authored a George Soros-financed war plan to kill talk radio.

In his powerful FCC post, Lloyd is shaping the critical components of the Obama administration’s backdoor censorship of electronic and digital communications. He is doing it through the “regulatory” process--outside any specific congressional authority. FCC has the power to determine who gets broadcast licenses and who is barred. Political misuse of that power is the key.

In terms of the sanctity of the Constitutional right of free speech as we know it today, Lloyd’s views are scary. In his 2006 book, “Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America,” he wrote:

“It should be clear ... that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.”

In Lloyd’s worldview and from his prism of intolerance, “[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”

Lloyd’s 2007 declaration of war against broadcast free speech, “The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio,” came under scathing criticism from many true free speech advocates, including the NRA. But keep in mind that with this administration, criticism is always treated as nothing more than a “distraction” from the relentless agenda.

Lloyd’s attack on commercial talk-radio calls for a redistribution of broadcast licenses--taking them from commercial broadcasters carrying hugely successful commentators and giving those licenses to local “progressives,” who otherwise would have no audience at all. Lloyd whined about the fact that left-wing Air America Radio drew audiences in “progressive” metropolitan areas that were so small as to be unmeasurable. Talkers like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity in those same cities garnered huge audiences. For Lloyd, market share is a myth.

With that as evidence, Lloyd declared, “. . . that conservative talk radio dominates the airwaves of our country to the detriment of informed public discourse and the First Amendment.”

Got that? The free market of ideas--where individual Americans choose with their radio dials--exists “to the detriment of the First Amendment.”

Condemning what he calls the “power of right-wing talk radio and their echo chambers in the conservative blogosphere,” Lloyd has demanded that commercial broadcasters “. . . should pay to support public broadcasters who will operate on behalf of the local community. . . . We want either clear rules that promote these First Amendment values or a reasonable payment to the public for the use of its property.” According to CNSNews.com, “reasonable payment” amounts to “. . . a sum equal to their (commercial broad-casters) total operating costs.”

With Lloyd empowered as “Diversity Czar” at the FCC--and Soros ultimately pulling the strings--this effort in the coming months to turn radical anti-First Amendment theory into public policy will move at a rapid pace. It will be merely one part of a flood of “Change” aimed at silencing any political opposition at any cost, especially my voice and your voice.

As freedom-loving Americans, we, the people, must put our members of Congress on notice. Stop the FCC’s backdoor attempt to choke off talk radio. And protect the Internet. As Benjamin Franklin put it: “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” We must not let that happen--not today--not ever.


Posted: 11/16/2009 11:46:30 AM

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last