What my 8 year old learned in school this week...

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rev. Dr. Michael D.D. on May 25, 2009 at 12:40pm

Americans no longer trust the free press to be their eyes and ears
The American Press Mainstream Treachery

Restore our Constitution
By JB Williams Sunday, May 24, 2009

Honest unbiased reporting in the American news room has been so absent for so long that most Americans now seek information elsewhere. Americans no longer trust the free press to be their eyes and ears, to keep them abreast of the facts needed to make intelligent decisions about daily life or politics. Sadly, at this moment in history, even Russia has a more reliable free press than America. If Americans don’t read foreign news sources, they have no clue what is going on in their own country, much less the world.

“The American people continue to remain, for the most part, blissfully unaware of catastrophe looming before them and continue to believe the litany of Orwellian lies being poured upon them by their propaganda media organs, never once raising any objection to trillions of dollars that have been stolen from them and which continues to flow the pockets of their political and corporate overlords intent upon destroying, forever, their once great Nation and which the US Federal Reserve Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman stated brazenly before the US Congress that she has “no idea” where $9 Trillion of US taxpayer has gone, or who got it.” - Bilderberg Group orders destruction of US Dollar?—A pretty important story for U.S. readers I’d say, but it remains unreported by the U.S. press!

As a result of horrific news reporting, talk radio and the Internet have largely replaced the daily newspaper, and that’s why leftists currently running Washington DC are very focused on “bailing out” their friendly propaganda rags, while gaining editorial control over talk radio and the Internet.

Thanks to the Internet, one can access news reports from all over the globe, like this story also unreported by the American press, Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation—which reads like a Hitler social engineering horror story.

From the story, “The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.”

This story is not about the billionaire Bilderberg meeting in Europe, but a similar meeting of anti-American billionaires which took place in America during the same time frame, attended by none other than America’s biggest leftist heroes, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Jr., Warren Buffett, George Soros, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey. The Times UK reported it, but what American press room ran with the frightening headline?

Something VERY evil this way comes, and nobody in the American press wants to investigate or report a single word of it!

Beyond the No. 1-ranked Fox News Channel, few bother watching an overtly leftist mass propaganda system which has become little more than an outlet for leftist talking points. From every alphabet network news desk to every network morning show, and now even the late night comedy hours, TV media is full-tilt off the charts and hard left in their presentation. They have taken a side in the social engineering of America, indeed the world, and everything they produce today is designed to push an anti-American agenda for tomorrow.

Fox is the only news outlet in the entire country that is accused of being a mouthpiece of “the right.” This charge is leveled on the basis that Fox is the only electronic news outlet that even makes an attempt to offer both sides of every story, in a nation where all other electronic media outlets offer only left-wing talking points.

But even Fox News must now be questioned about its integrity as an honest and unbiased outlet for news. The biggest stories in modern political history remains completely unreported in the American mainstream press, including at Fox.

The Ticking Time Bomb

Every American journalist knows the constitutional qualifications for the Oval Office that have existed for more than 200 years. Every journalist knows that Barack Obama has spent nearly $1 million dollars keeping proof that he meets those requirements under lock and key. Every journalist knows that Barack Obama may or may not have been born a natural citizen of the United States, that he certainly was adopted as a citizen of Indonesia in his youth, which at the time did not allow dual citizenship, that he traveled under an Indonesian passport during his college years, and may have even received foreign aid as a foreign student while at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard.

Not one of the mainstream journalists, including at “right-wing” Fox News Network, has taken up an investigative journalist interest to get to the bottom of what is slowly but surely becoming the most explosive story in recent political history.

Alphabet journalists rush to scoop the latest on Lindsay Lohan, American Idol, CIA interrogation procedures, Gore’s Global Warming Swindle, and a laundry list of nonessential tabloid stories. But not one has accepted the challenge of breaking what promises to be a political story that could make Watergate look like a story on the joys of watching paint dry.

This is nothing new… When Bill Clinton accepted $300,000 in illegal Red Chinese campaign money, bagman Johnny Chung became a household name and eventually went to prison for illegal campaign contributions, which coincidentally resulted in the US sharing of nuclear technology and permanent favored nation trade status with Communist China.

But the press never asked the first question about the people who benefited from those illegal campaign contributions, the Clintons. The press was systematically MIA on every story of Clinton corruption, except the sexy stained blue dress story of course, which provided a much-needed distraction from the more important headlines gone missing during the period.

No Place to Run This Time

But the issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility is such a huge powder keg, the idea of someone tricking congress, the Supreme Court, the news media and the American people into electing someone completely and fundamentally ineligible for office, leaves the press room no place to hide from such an overt act of treachery.

A man whose résumé is limited to a laundry list of ill-advised associations, a missing birth certificate and sealed college records, with no background of leadership anywhere, is the current president of the United States and not one single mainstream journalist has any interest in how this was possible.

However, in the end, there will be no place to run and no place to hide from the truth. Sooner or later, the truth will be known.
A Complicit Press—an uncommon Treachery

Americans have come to expect crime and corruption from their politicians. But they once expected their free press to hold the guilty accountable for their actions.

Today, the press is a complicit party to that crime and corruption. The press is overtly engaged in treachery. They are not ignoring the biggest story in US political history; they are actively working to keep it under cover.

Obama ran a 2-year campaign for leftist power and not one American journalist broke the story about how the man who would become president was in no way qualified for the position. More than six months after the election, still not one American journalist has investigated the growing charges that Obama fails the constitutional requirements for the Oval Office.

Their answer to public inquiry?—They checked it out at Snopes or FactCheck.org, both of which are propaganda tools owned and operated by the pro-Obama left, for benefit of the anti-American take over of the greatest free nation ever known to mankind, and they are satisfied.

Hogwash! Even Republican members of congress have used Internet postings by alleged “truth keepers” run by MoveOn.org or Code Pinko types, to escape their responsibility to properly vet a candidate for the most powerful office in the land, out of fear that someone in the press will label them a “racist” or “right-wing extremists” for asking the most obvious and pertinent question of our time.
Where’s the Birth Certificate?

Because the American press is MIA on the most important issue of our day, a very real constitutional crisis has left the American people to their own imaginations and devices. If Obama is constitutionally eligible, he can prove it. So why won’t he?

It is a very simple fundamental query, and it is entirely fair. Yet not a single member of the press, Congress or courts will ask the question, or allow any American to ask it, and Obama has spent $1 million bucks to keep all of his files Top Secret on the matter. Why?

The American press is entirely complicit in what will likely turn out to be the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people; one that in the end, has all the potential of destroying everything America has ever been.

To be complicit, “choosing to be involved in an illegal or questionable act, esp. with others; having complicity,” in the case of the American press, is an overt act of treachery, a “violation of faith; betrayal of trust; treason.”

Quite frankly, when the final truth is known about whom and what Barack Obama really is, every member of the press, Congress and courts who complicity refused to ask the question, should go down in flames with every member of the DNC who orchestrated the hoax from day one.

It is quite clear now that Obama’s agenda is in no way an American agenda for benefit of American interests of freedom and liberty for all. The notion that anyone needs to list all of the anti-American steps of the new president at this late date, just to prove that point, is beyond childish. If you don’t already know it, then you don’t know anything about America.

But the outright treachery of the American press is also wholly unacceptable. The decisions the people make can never be any better than the information used to make those decisions. The press is directly responsible for making certain that the American people are working with false or incomplete information, driven only by their overt leftist bent.

Since the outcome of their collusion with anti-American leftists will likely be not only a true constitutional crisis, but one of catastrophic magnitude, the press must be held accountable for their role in the destruction of the greatest nation on earth.

I pray that one mainstream journalist somewhere in the US will grow the patriotic backbone to ask the right people the right questions before it is too late. If the American people want somewhere to focus all of their anger, I suggest they focus it upon the traitorous press who has worked so diligently for so long to keep every American citizen of every political stripe in the dark, as their nation was being systematically raped and plundered by secular socialists. The TEA Party should be held on the front steps of every major news network, shutting down the American press until the news room is forced to report honest news again.

God Bless America and May God bless at least one American journalist with the honesty and courage to do the job entrusted to them by our Founding Fathers. They are either the unbiased eyes and ears of a trusting American populace under siege by political fraud, or they are an active participant in that fraud. There is no middle ground on a story this obvious and important.

God may forgive them for what they have done, but the American people never will!

The American people need just ONE mainstream journalist to step forward and accept the calling of their chosen profession, to make sure that the American people have access to the truth. Does any such journalist still exist today?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jeffery J Cole on May 27, 2009 at 1:15am

I respectfully disagree. If it is Joan's intent to file some civil action against the school, she should exhaust ALL adminstrative remedies first. She should go up against the local school board once the Superintendent has denied her grievance. And she should document everything that is said at the meetings. Usually, SOMEBODY will say something wrong and anything they say in a public forum can be used against them.

The wording in the policy is ambiguous. Joan can prove her point as well as the school. As a matter of fact, it appears the school did not even try to defend its position; instead, it just said no.

I would take my case to the school board, await a decision, and if the school board says no, then she should file a formal complaint with the State's Attorney General. THEN, contact Jay Seculow. Some judges will not even hear a complaint unless the plaintiff has exhausted all administrative remedies first.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Matthew on May 25, 2009 at 11:52pm

Except, of course, heterosexual unions between married Christian couples.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by ronda brown - pitbull czar on May 26, 2009 at 12:15am

Wow! If you have a little time on your side and could keep yourself from ripping the system apart, I 'd love to see you find a non christian student, have him pass out a few fliers from his church, mosque, or whatever. Then wait and see if that student is denied his freedom of speech and of religion as Anthony has been. I bet not!!!!!
I do agree w/ contacting Hannity and the other FOX hosts. I had an incident similar to this several years ago when my daughter was in high school. A friend of mine has a business that makes those (sometimes tacky looking) magnetic car "get the word out" signs usually used by businesses as advertisements. You would not believe people who will sit thru a green light, stand in parking lots, pull up right beside you on a busy street, etc. just to read what's on them. It does get the word out !!!!!!! It generated conversation daily. Our newspaper here is very liberal also, needless to say that was no option for us either.
Good luck to you. Don't give up. That's what they want us to do.
ronda brown

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by CMW on May 26, 2009 at 4:07am

Generally.....the school is "right" on this one.....but.....the reason should NOT have been stated that "some don't believe in God"......although probably true. I have always had rules like this at schools I attended and in the workplace as well......it was considered "soliciting" and other stuff......and yes, you ALWAYS had to have school approval or employer approval to post or distribute things. When they say "Non school materials".....they are talking about perhaps such as.....you kid selling candy for a boyscout troop.....or cards and gifts from a catalogue at Christmas time for your church.....things like this.....NOT BY ANY MEANS.....political type stuff, or religious type things. To my knowledge it has NEVER been allowed in schools to do that.....and in most workplaces its not either.

They feel this will incite anger from those who do not agree......basically, yes....its a way to silence us......but "rules" are "rules". I am NOT saying I think they are "right" doing this.....but......as far as I can remember.....this is NOT UNUSUAL.....and I graduated in 1978......so its been a LONG TIME and they STILL had those rules !!!! Parents will be calling the school saying your child is trying to "indoctrinate" their kids into your way of thinking and stuff like that.....it becomes chaotic.....so they just make "rules" you aren't allowed to do this. ALOT of schools ALSO will not let you wear clothes that have religious sayings on them....political type stuff......or of course....vulgar or bad words ect......I even read about a case where a girl was suing the school she attended cause she was wearing a rosary and the school system claimed it was some "gang symbol" where they were......and so she was told she could not wear it......and the girl was NOT in any gang.....she was a Catholic. Some schools wont let you wear headrags and other things.....that could be "gang associated"......whether or not.....they ACTUALLY ARE that......

Anyhow.....this is a pretty "typical" reaction......ESPECIALLY if this is a PUBLIC SCHOOL !!!! Pretty much the flyers WERE "against school rules".......but the explanation AS TO WHY.......wasnt a "good one".....and may give you a leg to stand on to fight this......cause that makes it sort of like.....against religion......but typically that doesnt matter either cause they don't want you passing out religious stuff from the get go.......they just dont go as FAR as to SAY.....its cause some don't believe in God......obviously that is "implied" by their denial.

Oh well.....that is my two cents.....I think the decision by the school is wrong......but you have to realize....what if a Muslim goes to school passing out flyers promoting jihad or something? I mean......they couldnt tell him no either......cause he would use your son's flyer as an "example" that his is "no different".......it would be of course.....but you see my point?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by John P. on May 26, 2009 at 1:00pm

I tried doing that at school once and got into some hot water, thought the teacher did sweep it under the rug. My Political Science Summer school class starts tomorrow.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Swear on May 26, 2009 at 5:25pm

I know one person who will be interested in your problem. His name is Lou Dobbs. Hw is on CNN every night M-F from 7 until 8 PM. Give him the whole story and do tell him about how you feel about your newspaper and the far left media. You may findout that he feels the same way. Type in Loudobbstonight@cnn.com Let him know how important this is to not only you and your children but to many others. Good Luck.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Larry Rice on May 26, 2009 at 8:24pm

Learned by experience. The SYSTEM is paid to maintain the system. Their paycheck depends on keeping step with the SYSTEM.
They will ignore as long as possible, stonewall, bring committees, then change committees till they get one that agrees with them.
They get paid for their time, you don''t. They win. They have revolving doors of beauracracy to occupy your time.

Christians need to TRUST GOD, and obey HIM. One thing He gives as guidance is "be not unequally yoked". Applied here, it means get out of the public school. You are sending your child to a brain-grinder, ( as in meat-grinder). The victim list began when Dick and Jane series replaced McGuffey Readers in the 30's . Use the search feature at www.ChristianParents.com for more info on "John Dewey"
the "Father of Modern Education ".

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by richard on May 26, 2009 at 9:30pm

Trooper is right.....you should definitely contact the ACLJ (American Center for Law and Justice). They deal with this kind of thing all the time. Website is www.aclj.org.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Rachel on May 27, 2009 at 11:33am

I am so sorry for the episode! I wonder just what your son thinks of it at his young age. Have you considered home schooling? It is beyond one parent's ability to fix such a massive broken system that is our public schools. You might consider reading the book, "Public Schools:Public Menace" by Joel Turtel.

If more parents withdrew their children, we could turn it around. If you work full time like I do, don't let it stop you. Again, you really need to read that book as it will explain all the reasons parents feel unable or unqualified to home school. It will also point out why and where public schools fail. We are starting home schooling this year, as I am fed up with the anti-Christian, and No Tolerance Policy. They are teaching my child what I do not want him taught! They are not teaching what they should be teaching. Public schools are an aggressive propaganda machine, that only serves to dumb down and falsely educate them into how they want them to think. It's draconian control. And they have 12 years to do it in.

I personally chose to go with a Christian based umbrella school. They will test your child to see exactly where they are and start the curriculum based on the individual needs. The lessons are broken up into PACES. They are designed so the student can also work on their own. It only takes 3-4 hours a day. But do your own research, and see what you would be comfortable with. God bless you hon!

P.S. There are many good people involved with public education. But they cannot buck the system and they need their jobs as we each need ours.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Larry Rice on May 28, 2009 at 2:10am

Dear Rachel, the P.S. comment you wrote shows our American acceptance of the rule of pramatism saying the end
" a paycheck" justifies the means "agreeing with those you know are wrong and are hurting people". That's what the good
Protestant and Catholic Germans did in the 1930's and 40's. An American preacher from 1810 wrote about how quickly the people turned from God to worship the dollar-profit-god. Three books have been written on the comparison of Americans now to the Germans during those years. Erich Fromme also wrote on the theme Escape from Freedom. The Holy Bible has a fewr things to say on the theme of expediency also. Narrow is the true gate, broad is the false gate.

Consider if all the teachers who carry their bible on Sunday were to get themselves fired from the state school.... soon we would all be able to have private schools. It just requires people doing the righteous thing instead of the paycheck serving thing. Serving the paycheck is idolatry, having another god before ALMIGHTY GOD our CREATOR and SAVIOUR, and He calls that the same as whoredom. Whoring after other gods. Adulterous nation. That's where it, the idea of adultery against GOD comes from, serving other gods. See Mark 8 above and below verse 38

We could have schools for children that lifted up God to our children, and allowed the little children to "come unto Him", but because we as a nation disobey His clear instructions, we serve schools that lead children into the broad path of destruction, and that can't be good, neither for the teacher nor for the children. Just think, a teacher named John Doe
could be teaching in a school where every day he got to lift up God and His way of seeing things to the children.... but instead..... he stays bound in a chain by a system that buys him with money. What is the definition of a whore? Giving of service for money instead of love.

www.ChristianParents.com is the website of a father of four who discovered in 1990 a dark trail of abominations in the public school system which up until then he had just assumed was much improved over the decades, but found it to be far worse, poisoned, and poisoning the souls of children. Arsenic in the children's milk is what they did.
The parents see a nice glass of milk, but the planners know there is arsenic in each glass, hard to discover without much time and effort.

The book, brave new schools, gives a concise account of many things.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Rachel on May 28, 2009 at 9:11pm

I feel I understand your position, but it's harsh and not very realistic. First of all, if I were a teacher, I wouldn't necessarily be able to afford being re-educated for a different career. Many of them are in the same boat. Many of them see some of the problems with the system, but choose to try to make a difference right where they are. They know God can and will use them for good. It isn't sinful to be a teacher. But you make it sound that way.

It's the rare company or employer who does everything by Christian values. It's up to the individual to manifest Christianity right where they are planted. Having said that, I cannot and I won't judge someone who chooses to be a teacher. I can however, judge my own relationship with my Savior and my God. If I felt I was doing wrong, I would have to make a change. But no way can I tell a teacher that they are doing evil! They are not.

▶ Reply to This

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page