BREAKING NEWS!!! Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Chance1 on September 12, 2009 at 9:32pm

But--Can Erik Holder make this go away? I hope not. ?We have to watch this closely. We have to scream if he does.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Phil AGJ Spokesman 3% OathKeeper on September 11, 2009 at 3:49am

MORE BREAKING NEWS BELOW:

From: John Charlton [mailto:mr.john_charlton@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:14 PM
To: Edward C. Noonan; Neil Turner; Jeff Schwilk; stopxspp@qmail.com
Subject: Press Inquiry from the Post & Email



Dear Mr. Noonan, Turner and Schwilk,

I address this inquiry to your immediate attention.

I am writing on behalf of The Post & Email, an Article II patriot news blog, to confirm the report at Resist Net, that you men have confirmed that Orly has received immediate discovery in the action, Barnett vs. Obama, from Judge Carter.

Anything you can send me or relate,which I can publicly quote, I would appreciate, for a story on this I am writing for this morning's edition.

Here are links to previous stories about Orly at the Post & Email

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/captain-rhodes-to-get...

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/captain-connie-rhodes...

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/orly-before-judge-car...

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/dr-orly-taitz-files-t...


Sincerely,

Mr. John Charlton

The Post & Email

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Neil Turner
To: 'John Charlton'
Cc: 'Edward C. Noonan' ; 'Jeff Schwilk' ; stopxspp@qmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: Press Inquiry from the Post & Email


John;

This is the best I can determine at this point, so this is what I sent out tonight:

Attached is a COURT ORDER by Judge David O. Carter setting a Scheduling Conference for October 5, 2009 (CASE NO. SA CV09-0082-DOC(ANx) in the Case of BARNETT et al v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA et al.

Please note lines 3 - 6 (page 2): … the Court encourages the parties to begin discovery before the Scheduling

Conference. The parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Rule 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be produced in the early stages of discovery, because at the Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines to complete discovery.

However, it should be noted that an (in Chambers) ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, issued today, Thursday, 09/10/09 (attached as a pdf file) could mean that Magistrate Judge Nakazato may rule on expediting discovery later this month, or that no discovery can be conducted absent voluntary assent from all sides.

I’m no lawyer, so you be the judge.

Neil Turner
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Edward C. Noonan:

Pamela,

Could you give all of us a brief summary, or as well as you can explain the new scheduling
order that Judge Carter issued today. The Court Order #2 is attached to this email as an
attachment. Since you are lead plaintiff you would know better than anyone.

Judge Carter stated in his order: "The parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of
Rule 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be produced in the early
stages of discovery, because at the Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight
deadlines to complete discovery."

In addition:

RULE 26(f) REPORT
The parties shall file their Rule 26(f) report with the Court no later than fourteen (14) days prior to
the Scheduling Conference set by the Court. The report shall contain the following:
(1) a short factual summary of the case and of claims and defenses;
(2) a short synopsis of the principal issues in the case;
(3) a statement of whether parties are likely to be added and whether the pleadings are likely to
be amended (counsel should note that the Court sets a deadline of ninety (90) days after the
date the Scheduling Order is issued for the joinder of parties and the amendment of
pleadings; any motions to join parties or for leave to amend must be filed within sixty (60)
days of the day the Scheduling Order is issued to allow them to be determined prior to the
90-day deadline);
(4) a statement as to issues which any party believes may be determined by motion and a listing
of then-contemplated law and motion matters;
(5) a statement of what settlement discussions have occurred and what settlement procedure is
recommended, pursuant to Local Rules 16-15 through 16-15.9 (specifically excluding any
statement of the terms discussed and specifically including, if mediation is chosen, the
particular mediator who has been chosen);
(6) a discovery plan, which should set forth discovery phases, the order of discovery, and any
limitations on discovery;

I hope a satisfactory DISCOVERY PLAN can be crafted/edited/compressed in the 26 days that
is listed that it must be accomplished. I don't envy Dr. Taitz nor Gary Kreep Esq. They will need
to compile several hundreds of pages into a single report...what a challenge! Heck, some of our
Grand Jury presentments against Soetoro were several pages long!...

I hope that all of the following can be 'DISCOVERED:'

(a) a certified copy of "vault" (original long version) birth certificate;
(b) certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack
Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham;
(c) a certified copy Certification of Citizenship;
(d) a certified copy Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity;
(e) certified copies of admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University
and Harvard Law School; and
(f) certified copies of any court orders or legal documents changing his name from Barry
Soetoro.

Let us know which of the hundreds of SEALED SOETORO/OBAMA DOCUMENTS will be asked for.

Ed//
Edward C. Noonan
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

BELOW, I HAVE ATTACHED BOTH DOCUMENTS, PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY...ALSO, I WILL BE AWAITING THE PLAINTIFF'S (PAMELA BARNETT) brief summary, and/or her explanation of the new scheduling order that Judge Carter issued today on 09/10/2009 email from Mr. Ed Noonan...

Attachments:

• COURT ORDER #2 BARNETT CASE 19547072-03118728478.pdf, 28 KB
• ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 91009.pdf, 25 KB

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Johnny Beowulf on September 13, 2009 at 8:50am

Lots of Loopholes there. I'd say without an " ORDER to COMPEL" . YOU GET NOTHING. If you know anything about the courts you know this can go on forever.

Order to Compel
Order to Refute
Appeal
Appeal
Order to Compel
etc.

Each stage has a time line and can add to the issues. I had one case that went on from SEPT 01 to May 08. Had 6 different "Order to Compel" . Who knows maybe the OBAMA attorneys are just STUPID and don't know. There will be so many fights over the " DISCOVERY " it will take year(s).

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Lewis Edinger on September 11, 2009 at 6:23am

There's more info & an actual copy of the birth certificate @
http://americangrandjury.org

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by connie bierzonski on September 11, 2009 at 9:42am

I truly hope this is the start of something big - proving BHO is and never will be eligible to be POTUS.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Barbara on September 11, 2009 at 10:05am

Is anyone going to the hearing today that can keep us up to date on what is happening with it?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by prowlland on September 11, 2009 at 12:35pm

This is great... but do remember that we dont really care where he was born:

Birth,therefore,does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essentail in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen
of the United States,

***that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof,***

or in case he be illegitimate,
that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth.
George D. Collins---->He is a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States, and has been prominent in cases of Federal cognizance/He has been Secretary of the Bar Association, and has become widely known by reasons of his articles on constitutional law

http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~npmelton/sfbcol.htm


The Holy Grail of POTUS Eligibility Law Review Articles: Mr. Obama and Mr. Arthur… Meet Attorney George Collins


http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/25/the-holy-grail-o...

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Barbara on September 11, 2009 at 1:55pm

How can this be???

Filed & Entered: 09/10/2009 Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19633550/03118745409

Filed & Entered: 09/10/2009 Ex Parte Application for Order re Discovery Matter


http://www.sc...ribd.com/doc/19633565/03118746941
and
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19633559/03118746940

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jim Compton on September 11, 2009 at 2:48pm

The DOJ filing the motion to stay the discovery order dose not surprise me at all. It will not surprise me to see them go to the 9th Circuit Court to appeal the discovery order if Carter does not grant the stay and to go to the Supreme Court to have ....guess who......order the stay. This is long from over. Obama is not going to let this go without a fight as his Presidency depends on hiding his records.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by ralph e on September 11, 2009 at 2:22pm

Thanks Phil, maybe he will be one of the ones going to jail this week end.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by David Kelley C.C. on September 11, 2009 at 4:03pm

I think at this point all Erik Holder has to do is get out of the way! and he should because of a conflict of interest. Can the judge order him to cease and decist (not sure of the spelling) if the doj keeps interjecting on behalf of Obama? My guess is yes he can, but I am not a legal mind. It is my understanding that the Department of Justice exists to enforce the law, not protect an individual or bring to bear undue pressure for a group of people within government. I may be wrong.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Susan on September 11, 2009 at 4:22pm

I had a hunch this would be allowed to happen as his pole numbers continued to slide. Glenn Beck said we would witness many mighty miracles and I believe this is one of them.

▶ Reply to This

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• Next ›
• Page