Asst Natl Dir Mellie

Breaking News: Federal Judge Blocks Part of Arizona Immigration Law/ ARIZONA WILL APPEAL!!!

Please Note: Any and All comments that refer to any type of Militant Behavior or Secession will be deleted and an warning sent. Before you post your comment refer to our No Tolerance Policy.



Published July 28, 2010


| FoxNews.com




A federal judge on Wednesday blocked some of the toughest provisions in the Arizona
immigration law, putting on hold the state's attempt to enforce federal
immigration policy. 


Though the rest of the law is still set to go into effect Thursday, the partial injunction on SB 1070 means
Arizona, for the time being, will not be able to require police officers
to determine the immigration status of anyone they stop or arrest. 


U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton also struck down the section of law that makes it a crime for someone to fail to
carry immigration registration papers and the provision that makes it a
crime for an illegal immigrant to seek or perform work.



Click here to read the ruling.



In all, Bolton struck down four sections of the law, the ones that opponents called the most controversial. Bolton
said she was putting those sections on hold until the courts resolve the
issues.


Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law. 


The ruling came just as police were making last-minute preparations to begin enforcement of the law and protesters
were planning large demonstrations to speak out against the measure. At
least one group planned to block access to federal offices, daring
officers to ask them about their immigration status. 


The volume of the protests will likely be turned down a few notches because of the ruling by Bolton, a Clinton
appointee who suddenly became a crucial figure in the immigration debate
when she was assigned the seven lawsuits filed against the Arizona
law. 


Lawyers for the state contend the law was a constitutionally sound attempt by Arizona -- the busiest illegal gateway
into the country -- to assist federal immigration agents and lessen
border woes such as the heavy costs for educating, jailing and providing
health care for illegal immigrants. 


Opponents argued the law will lead to racial profiling, conflict with federal immigration law and distract local
police from fighting more serious crimes. The U.S. Justice Department,
civil rights groups and a Phoenix police officer had asked the judge for
an injunction to prevent the law from being enforced.


ARIZONA WILL APPEAL THIS RULING!


The Associated Press contributed to this report. 


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/28/federal-judge-rules-ariz...

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Read these 3 short articles-same author, and email-fax-call them-AZ about these articles easy to read-follow-transmit; highly relevent and possibly overlooked; case-changing-winning findings-strategy for this cases-appeal:

Arizona is not usurping federal power with SB-1070, but the big lie continues. Why?
http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topics/arizona-is-not-usurping

This is from the above article:

Arizona’s lawyer needs to immediately invoke "Judicial Notice" with the court and provide the historical documentation, it's in the US Constitution page # line #, that the intended power granted over “naturalization” is limited to the power of setting the qualifications an alien must meet to become a “citizen of the united States”, and the word immigration is not even mentioned anywhere in regards to this whole matter.

JUDICIAL NOTICE

On the federal trial court level, judicial notice is recognized in rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence for U.S. District Courts and Magistrates. Rule 201 provides, in part, that "[a] judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.

Under rule 201 a trial court must take judicial notice of a well-known fact at the request of one of the parties, if the court is provided with information supporting the fact. A court also has the option to take judicial notice at its discretion, without a request from a party.

The 2cnd article listed by the same author is in a comment on page 2 of the above article:

Edwin Kneedler Deputy Solicitor General for the DOJ makes it up, re-writes history for the judge in the Arizona SB-1070 case!
http://www.resistnet.com/xn/detail/2600775:Comment:2406675?xg

3rd article:

Judge Bolton must dismiss feds case against Arizona, feds have failed to establish a cause of action!
http://www.resistnet.com/xn/detail/2600775:Topic:2423265?xg_source=...

All 3 articles separate and togethrer cover the easy to read-follow-transmit; highly relevent and possibly overlooked; case-changing-winning findings-strategy for this cases-appeal.

Governor of Arizona
Jan Brewer
1700 West Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Telephone (602) 542-4331
Toll Free 1-(800) 253-0883 (within Arizona only)
Fax (602) 542-1381

To email Gov AZ, email contact form:
http://azgovernor.gov/Contact.asp

State Senator Russell Pearce author of AZ-SB-1070
rpearce@azleg.gov

psenenseman@az.gov
Director, Communications.

Joe Kanefield
General Counsel

Christy Myers Smith
Deputy, General Counsel

Reply to This

rel find,
I'm beginning to wonder if this is nothing but to start a civil raciest war to finish their agenda before November! You got to see that Jan Brewer and her attorney's are not using all the REAL LEGAL ammo that's available to the state, think about it, with all these people here digging and finding info on things that the state can do WITHOUT the Federal government makes me wonder??? Think about it these lawyers don't already know all this stuff before they took on this case? Sure they did!!

Just look at everything you all have been finding out for months that shows the fed's didn't even need to be involved and she could of done this using all their state rights, go back read ALL of the posts and news clips even before this week......go back months...READ, RESEARCH LIKE WE SHOULD HAVE DONE IN 2008...Don't let this happen again this WILL be the end!
From the start Jan Brewer didn't need the government!!! WATCH OUT PEOPLE, WHAT'S THE OTHER HAND DOING??

I hope I'm NOT right or else we are in a world of crap when it does come to light!!
could this all be a part of their agenda???? And why wouldn't you think it wouldn't be????

I know alot of you will probably think I'm crazy but......I suggest we collect all the evidence and if 2 +2 =4 , then we have been had!!!

Reply to This

Anything is possible, but it's more likely that they just didn't sit down and figure out a wide-ranging-all-angles-covered and long term strategy-plan the correct-right way.

I commend them for their efforts but look what happened and now they've got to go to the 9th Circuit Court, good luck !

They got to get busy and change there AZ SB 1070 bill and then their defense of the bill so that when they get to the Supreme Court they'll get better results.

They need some highly competent-motivated-Conservative legal advisors as part of their legal-teams advisory panel.

Maybe they should have passed parts of the bill one step at a time instead of all at once.

They should have planned it out differently-better and even seen this as the obvious ruling to the way that they did it.

There had-has to be a better way to go about this wqhole thing and block the obviously corrupt motivation and actions by the Feds on this whole issue.

Another thing, this win by the Feds has now imboldened the supreme traitor in chief to now go on to grant the illegal-aliens amnesty. Because now he feels that the Fed Court has confirmed that only the Feds can handle immigration metters.

So now he's emboldened to do it even more than before, because he won the case, so he feels that he can get away with it. His prime motivation, being to block all further efforts by the States on this matter by simply granting some, most, or all of them amnesty.

He'll probably say that all illegal-aliens are now under review, thereby taking them out of the jurisdiction of the States. Then he'll say, ok, we will give amnesty to 3,000,000 per year for the next 5 years, close the border, give work visas to all of them while they are under review.

This way they are not illegal-aliens anymore becuse they're all under review by the Feds, and then the States simply could not touch them because they are not illegal-aliens anymore.

They would have to register to be in the program. But still the Feds would say that the States cannot check if an illegal they've; stopped, questioned, detained, arrested is registered because they are not asking them to do so.

Since the Fed Court said that only the Feds can regulate immigration policy in the US, then the States would have to comply in not asking if a; stopped, questioned, detained, or arrested illegal-alien is registered into the new program.

Of course we must do everything that we can to get our US and State Congressmen and Governors to stop these; freakin, filthy, corrupt, tyrannical, criminal-traitor Feds from doing any of that listed above !

I despise them and take what they do to our country on a very personal level, and hope that they get what's coming to them right now, today, that includes Bush-1, Clinton, Bush-2, and O-bumb-er

Topic 'This week's Globe article "Obama Gay Murder Cover-up!"'

Reply to This

This is just another reason why we have to be so active about appointing and vetting our judges, and doing what we can to block the recent appointees! This is just CRAZY!!!!!

Reply to This

Did you see how our taxpayer money was being spent? ACORN and SEIU People were bused in to Arizona to demonstrate the other day. Did you see the buses they were riding in? They were not school buses. How much did Congress give these two groups. Billions comes to mind. And they are using it to protest!!!! Way to go Government !!!!

Reply to This

This is one of my pet peaves with the Republicans. They controlled the entire government for years, yet never made the slightest attempt to end taxpayer subsidies for the left wing radical and race-based hate groups like La Raza, ACORN and the NAACP. Even now they are perpetrating a gimmick known as You-Cut, allowing citizens to vote for their choice of budget cuts that the Republicans in Congress should propose, yet they are tightly controlling the choices and limiting them to trivial cuts instead of the cuts to the radical political groups.

Reply to This

They do deals with them, the; leftists-activists-groups-liberals-Democrats advocates in Congress, to get their votes on the bills that they, the R's want to pass.

Oh yeah, I just got it, they always needed to get them, the D's, not to fillibuster; Bush's, McCains, Grahams, and the long list of R's, middle-east-oil-wars and corrupt-criminal; Federal-Reserve, Wall-Street, big-banking-financial, derivatives-credit-default-swaps-deregulations.

Because they, the R's, always had less than 60 R votes in the Senate, and with Clinton they also needed him to sign their corrupt-criminal bills.

That's it, it's all much clearer now. That fact has alluded me in the past few weeks while I've been writing alot about the Republican controlled Congress from Jan 1995-Jan 2007.
.
What I kept putting in my comments was that they did deals with the leftist-activist-liberal D's from Jan 1995-Jan 2001 even when they had large majorities n both Houses of Congress, because they needed Clintons signature.

Only now did I realize that they always also needed around 5 or more Democrats Senators Yes votes to get past the fillibuster in the Senate.

No matter, there is no excuse for any of the deals that they made with the leftist-activist-liberal Demovrats because most of the Republican bills that they were doing deals with the D's for, were bad anti-American-people bills anyway.

And there is no possible excuse to have given the Democrats what they wanted when they didn't have to.

Reply to This

The taxpayer funding of left-wing radica and race-based groups is one area that cannot be used for political compromise. By agreeing to fund the left-wing radical and race-based political groups, the Republicans have guaranteed their own demise. I wouldn't care about that, except that conservatives will never be able to control the government until the radical groups are defunded. Since Republicans won't do that, we need to look elsewhere for political solutions.

Reply to This

Obama wants these illegals in no matter what. He is using them to change the game. If he can get 30 or 40 million mexicans in here they will vote democrat. They will vote for him. America will then be changed forever into a democratic, socialist, communist country. This is a war and Obama is shifting the pieces on the board in his favor. Time is running out. He doesn't give a flip about regular americans. To Obama we are the enemy.

Reply to This

This is just too funny! This judge doesn't even have the authority to preside over a case involving a state.

Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction…

Judge Bolton has no authority whatsoever to preside or rule!

Full article found here: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25983

Reply to This

Great article, Gabby! This just points out once again how badly the mainstream media stinks for not sounding the alarm on this -- Fox News included. And what about the GOP, with their vast legal team? Dead silence! To hell with all of them! We need to spread this information ourselves, and do it quickly. I'm emailing it to everyone I know, in the hope that we can get this information to go viral across America! Thanks for posting the link!

Reply to This

Very good article,

Case Against Arizona & Governor Brewer
ONLY the US Supreme Court has Constitutional Authority to Conduct the Trial

The Author Publius Huldah
Publius Huldah
Most recent columns

Publius Huldah is a retired lawyer who lives in Tennessee USA. She writes on the U.S. Constitution and posts her papers at
publiushuldah.wordpress.com

Before getting a law degree, she got a degree in philosophy where she specialized in political philosophy and epistemology (theories of knowledge).

Using primarily The Federalist
Papers, which were written during 1787-1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison & John Jay, in order to explain the proposed Constitution to the American People and induce them to ratify it, Publius Huldah explains the true & original meaning of the U.S. Constitution.

She also shows how modern day judges on the U.S. federal courts have completely abandoned the U.S. Constitution and have substituted their own personal views and opinions for The Constitution.

---------------------------------------

Lets say that this can be pushed through. Can you comment on how or why the Supreme Court would rule any differently than Bolton did, as far as her stated reasons ?

Notice what Publius claims:

She also shows how modern day judges on the U.S. federal courts have completely abandoned the U.S. Constitution and have substituted their own personal views and opinions for The Constitution.

---------------------------------------

Does that apply to the current 5 Conservatives in the Supreme Court ?

Before rushing off-going to the Supreme Court, should Arizona change AZ SB 1070 in some keys ways-places, and their defense strategy too, better addressing some of Boltons opinions which might be shared by some members of the Supreme Court ?

Reply to This

RSS

Getting Started Resources and Action


Interview: Darla Dawald of ResistNet talks
about this weekend in New York City
Click HERE to download
Opening • The Jimmy Z Show Interview:
Darla Dawald of ResistNet.com

HATE SPEECH will NOT be TOLERATED! Click Here for our No Tolerance Policy

Discussion Forum

JAMES N. HALL III

Polls Predict Pro-Life Landside in November as Republicans Top Democrats 28 Replies

Started by JAMES N. HALL III. Last reply by The Stoys 10 hours ago.

JAMES N. HALL III

Pro-Abortion Democrats Sing 2010 Election Blues, May Abandon Some Members 2 Replies

Started by JAMES N. HALL III. Last reply by Darla, ADMIN / National Director 1 day ago.

Kathryn McEwen

DOCTOR'S 4 STATE ABORTION BUSINESS UNDER INVESITGATION 1 Reply

Started by Kathryn McEwen. Last reply by Linda Zarra Dist. 4 Coordinator Sep 7.

JAMES N. HALL III

Pro-Life Group Wants to Keep GOP Leaders Accountable on Opposing Abortion! 3 Replies

Started by JAMES N. HALL III. Last reply by Lorene Hopkins Sep 3.

Kathryn McEwen

NC STUDENTS PAY FOR ABORTION COVERAGE THEY DON'T WANT

Started by Kathryn McEwen Aug 23.

Kathryn McEwen

A DANGEROUS & DECEPTIVE NEW DRUG

Started by Kathryn McEwen Aug 20.

Kathryn McEwen

WHITE HOUSE APPROVES CLONING

Started by Kathryn McEwen Jul 31.

Kathryn McEwen

POST-ABORTION PROBLEMS COULD = LAWSUIT

Started by Kathryn McEwen Jul 27.

Kathryn McEwen

NO TAXPAYER FUNDING FOR ABORTION ACT TO BE INTRODUCED THURSDAY, REP. SMITH (R-NJ) 1 Reply

Started by Kathryn McEwen. Last reply by Linda Zarra Dist. 4 Coordinator Jul 26.

Kathryn McEwen

OBAMACARE ABORTIONS IN THE SOUTHWEST

Started by Kathryn McEwen Jul 18.

Kathryn McEwen

IOWA AG STILL BEATING AROUND THE BUSH

Started by Kathryn McEwen Jul 14.

ProudArmyWife

Bill pushing abortion in military

Started by ProudArmyWife Jul 2.

ProudArmyWife

Pro-life is PRO-WOMAN

Started by ProudArmyWife Jun 24.

From Our Tea Party Store!

Check out the description and reviews Here

The Obama Diaries
By Laura Ingraham

The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America
By Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer

This Book is Officially Out!

The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents--The Definitive Edition

Tie Dye Constitution Adult T-Shirt

March Details Here
March DC 9-09-9/11
To Donate to Make this a Successful Event Click Here:

Badge

Loading…

© 2010   Created by Grassfire Nation.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!