We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
Tags:
i am neither republican nor democrat. i am an independent centrist. regarding your question as to how we can publicize pelosi's ego at spending $500,000.00 of OUR dollars for fuel in her new huge plane during a year: I have searched and can find NO info that the story on this site is true. i neither care for obama's brand of government nor pelosi's, but i have no interest in smearing someone just to smear them. i do believe we should all "play fairly". hasn't anyone even checked at snopes.com? they say it is false.
i am neither republican nor democrat. i am an independent centrist. regarding your question as to how we can publicize pelosi's ego at spending $500,000.00 of OUR dollars for fuel in her new huge plane during a year: I have searched and can find NO info that the story on this site is true. i neither care for obama's brand of government nor pelosi's, but i have no interest in smearing someone just to smear them. i do believe we should all "play fairly". hasn't anyone even checked at snopes.com? they say it is false.
PB... you might not lean left or right, but I assure, Snopes tilts to the left... heavily. I'll see if I can find the verification you seek.
pb said:i am neither republican nor democrat. i am an independent centrist. regarding your question as to how we can publicize pelosi's ego at spending $500,000.00 of OUR dollars for fuel in her new huge plane during a year: I have searched and can find NO info that the story on this site is true. i neither care for obama's brand of government nor pelosi's, but i have no interest in smearing someone just to smear them. i do believe we should all "play fairly". hasn't anyone even checked at snopes.com? they say it is false.
Sir, either you are blind or have no contact with the outside world. I know for a fact this is true. Call pelosi's office and ask, or check the records of congress. You sir are part of the reason we have a mess like this. You want to sit there and blame some one, or wave the banner of untruth. I do not now or ever have started any post that I did not check out personally. So I think you need to keep your remarks to yourself if you know not what your talking about, because I sir do!
pb said:i am neither republican nor democrat. i am an independent centrist. regarding your question as to how we can publicize pelosi's ego at spending $500,000.00 of OUR dollars for fuel in her new huge plane during a year: I have searched and can find NO info that the story on this site is true. i neither care for obama's brand of government nor pelosi's, but i have no interest in smearing someone just to smear them. i do believe we should all "play fairly". hasn't anyone even checked at snopes.com? they say it is false.
PB... you might not lean left or right, but I assure, Snopes tilts to the left and their so called debunking often needs to be well, debunked. I'll see if I can find the verification you seek.
Okay..that didn't take long... how about the NY Post...
NY POST ARTICLE
pb said:i am neither republican nor democrat. i am an independent centrist. regarding your question as to how we can publicize pelosi's ego at spending $500,000.00 of OUR dollars for fuel in her new huge plane during a year: I have searched and can find NO info that the story on this site is true. i neither care for obama's brand of government nor pelosi's, but i have no interest in smearing someone just to smear them. i do believe we should all "play fairly". hasn't anyone even checked at snopes.com? they say it is false.
Thank you, Fira. I used your link, and this is the sentence that stands out in my mind: "Now the new speaker, Democrat Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, is demanding her own personal Pentagon-provided jet. " Yes, I have heard and read that, but that doesn't say she GOT what she was asking for. I, like you, wouldn't want her to have it, but all I can do is try to stop it from happening. I cannot smear her for doing something that she hasn't done or accomplished yet. And I did see that Mr. H. has responded again. He can dish it out, but he can't take it. Why am I not surprised. Regardless of his actions, if this site is here to throw dirt, color me gone. If it is here to help each other know what is really happening and suggestions about how to handle some problems associated with what IS happening, I'll stick around. I'm not here to argue with anyone, especially not idiots.
Fira said:PB... you might not lean left or right, but I assure, Snopes tilts to the left and their so called debunking often needs to be well, debunked. I'll see if I can find the verification you seek.
Okay..that didn't take long... how about the NY Post...
NY POST ARTICLE
pb said:i am neither republican nor democrat. i am an independent centrist. regarding your question as to how we can publicize pelosi's ego at spending $500,000.00 of OUR dollars for fuel in her new huge plane during a year: I have searched and can find NO info that the story on this site is true. i neither care for obama's brand of government nor pelosi's, but i have no interest in smearing someone just to smear them. i do believe we should all "play fairly". hasn't anyone even checked at snopes.com? they say it is false.
Jim, do the math and then tell me that this is not true. She only works 3, sometimes 4 days a week. She returns to her home every week via a 737. Fuel cost for that plane to L.A. from Dulles AP runs well over 50, 000. these figures are very conservative.
Lets do it another way and these figures come right from Boeing.
Let's run the numbers on the latest model of the Boeing 737-900. The plane burns about 2.4 gallons per nautical mile, and a trip from New York to Los Angeles, California, is about 2,100 nautical miles. So that means it would take about 5,000 gallons of Jet-A fuel to fly coast to coast. Now jet fuel is selling at my AP for over 3.00 per Gal. Remember these figures do not include maintenance, Crew salaries, landing fees handling fees, no, and on it goes.
Jim for Justice said:Hi Gary,
Thanks for posting this; I cannot stand Queen Pelois and her hypocritical ways. However, this info is not exactly correct. Check out the snopes.com article on this at http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp I think it is important that we focus on the thousand and one lies falsehoods of the Limousine Liberals, but not lose our credibility by stating things that aren't true. BTW, check out Peter Schweizer's Do As I Say, Not As I Do: Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy - he has a whole section on Queen Pelosi's hypocrisies
Wait I thought she was on a 757-200.
Garry H said:Jim, do the math and then tell me that this is not true. She only works 3, sometimes 4 days a week. She returns to her home every week via a 737. Fuel cost for that plane to L.A. from Dulles AP runs well over 50, 000. these figures are very conservative.
Lets do it another way and these figures come right from Boeing.
Let's run the numbers on the latest model of the Boeing 737-900. The plane burns about 2.4 gallons per nautical mile, and a trip from New York to Los Angeles, California, is about 2,100 nautical miles. So that means it would take about 5,000 gallons of Jet-A fuel to fly coast to coast. Now jet fuel is selling at my AP for over 3.00 per Gal. Remember these figures do not include maintenance, Crew salaries, landing fees handling fees, no, and on it goes.
Jim for Justice said:Hi Gary,
Thanks for posting this; I cannot stand Queen Pelois and her hypocritical ways. However, this info is not exactly correct. Check out the snopes.com article on this at http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp I think it is important that we focus on the thousand and one lies falsehoods of the Limousine Liberals, but not lose our credibility by stating things that aren't true. BTW, check out Peter Schweizer's Do As I Say, Not As I Do: Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy - he has a whole section on Queen Pelosi's hypocrisies
PB... I submit that the Speaker has said and done much to deserve scorn and derision of the American public. The latest example might be the so-called stimulus bill. Not only it's outrageous content, but her outrageous conduct in shoving it through for a vote without allowing anyone to read it, let alone debate it. Or the conference where all Republicans were shut out. I could go on, but I imagine you're informed on the issues and I refuse to defend the indefensible.
99 members
268 members
161 members
271 members
90 members
112 members
216 members
2824 members
68 members
64 members
150 members
77 members
96 members
113 members
201 members
Added by Dean Wright
© 2009 Created by Grassfire.org